The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $unreadreports - Line: 32 - File: global.php(961) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/global.php(961) : eval()'d code 32 errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php 961 eval
/showthread.php 28 require_once




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New exotic vacationland
#1
Looking for a new place to escape the cold Wisconsin winters ?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2...UclOyjV1j8
Reply
#2
From the article:

Quote:David Bromwich, a climate researcher at Ohio State University, noted, however, that while the Antarctic Peninsula has warmed strongly since the late 1940s, temperature trends in summer have been variable in recent decades, including a brief cooling spell since 1998. “So overall, this record looks to be a one time extreme event that doesn’t tell us anything about Antarctic climate change,” he wrote in an email.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#3
Yes. One time events mean nothing.

But to cherry pick a small out-of-context sniplet from the article to infer that the article says something it does not it, is dishonest as hell.
Reply
#4
Quote:One time events mean nothing.

But to cherry pick a small out-of-context sniplet from the article to infer that the article says something it does not it, is dishonest as hell.
Which is it: The article was about the one time 65 degree temp,so the article meant nothing,but then you say it does. It is very hard to follow you when you always seem to want everything both ways.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#5
(02-10-2020, 01:59 PM)k.d. Wrote:
Quote:One time events mean nothing.

But to cherry pick a small out-of-context sniplet from the article to infer that the article says something it does not it, is dishonest as hell.
Which is it: The article was about the one time 65 degree temp,so the article meant nothing,but then you say it does. It is very hard to follow you when you always seem to want everything both ways.

Read more than the title
Reply
#6
Quote:https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/anta...south-pole
Now
[Passing clouds.]
-35 °F

Passing clouds.

Feels Like: -62 °F
Forecast: -26 / -28 °F
Wind: 13 mph ↑ from East

Location: Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station

Current Time: Feb 11, 2020 at 8:41:02 am

Latest Report: Feb 11, 2020 at 7:00 am

Visibility: 7 mi

Pressure: N/A

Humidity: N/A

Dew Point: N/A
Anomaly.

5 years ago the temp was -40 not -35 OOOHHHH! I'm afraid. lmao.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#7
Thanks for the daily forecast. This is best the deniers can come up with. Kinda like when you go wild when it snows in May in Wisconsin LOL.
Reply
#8
When exactly is the sky falling, Chicken Little?

Atmospheric carbon dioxide rose by about 25 parts per million.
There’s no disputing that ambient CO2 has gone up in the atmosphere, however, that isn’t necessarily a bad thing. NASA, for example has this to say about the effects of that increased CO2 in study about CO2 and greening derived from satellite data.
Quote:From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25 2016
Quote:“We were able to tie the greening largely to the fertilizing effect of rising atmospheric CO2 concentration by tasking several computer models to mimic plant growth observed in the satellite data,” says co-author Prof. Ranga Myneni of the Department of Earth and Environment at Boston University.
Quote:“The greening over the past 33 years reported in this study is equivalent to adding a green continent about two-times the size of mainland USA (18 million km2)…”
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/...042216.php
[Image: 127-620x349.jpg]
This image shows the change in leaf area across the globe from 1982-2015. CREDIT Credits: Boston University/R. Myneni
Source: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate3004.html
It seems the Earth’s biosphere is responding to increased CO2 in a positive way, that’s also undeniable.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#9
(02-10-2020, 10:28 PM)k.d. Wrote: When exactly is the sky falling, Chicken Little?

Atmospheric carbon dioxide rose by about 25 parts per million.
There’s no disputing that ambient CO2 has gone up in the atmosphere, however, that isn’t necessarily a bad thing. NASA, for example has this to say about the effects of that increased CO2 in study about CO2 and greening derived from satellite data.
Quote:From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25 2016
Quote:“We were able to tie the greening largely to the fertilizing effect of rising atmospheric CO2 concentration by tasking several computer models to mimic plant growth observed in the satellite data,” says co-author Prof. Ranga Myneni of the Department of Earth and Environment at Boston University.
Quote:“The greening over the past 33 years reported in this study is equivalent to adding a green continent about two-times the size of mainland USA (18 million km2)…”
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/...042216.php
[Image: 127-620x349.jpg]
This image shows the change in leaf area across the globe from 1982-2015. CREDIT Credits: Boston University/R. Myneni
Source: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate3004.html
It seems the Earth’s biosphere is responding to increased CO2 in a positive way, that’s also undeniable.
Who said the sky is falling ?  
I'm a little confused. Both of your articles both seem to affirm that climate change is real. 
I don't think it is controversial that plants consume CO2. 
Was this supposed to be some kind of rebuttal ?
Reply
#10
I'm glad that you agree there is no need to worry about it and everything will be fine.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)