Posts: 5,069
Threads: 611
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation:
0
P and M is what we do.
The GOP Senate acquitted Trump before the proceedings began. Was that the framers idea of a jury ?
Posts: 6,766
Threads: 2,019
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
And the Democrats planned impeachment 16 minutes after he was sworn in. What's your point?
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 6,766
Threads: 2,019
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
Quote:When did I frame this post as a Dem/GOP issue.
When you said this, (unless you go back and 'edit' again and make it disappear)
Quote:The GOP Senate acquitted Trump before the proceedings began.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 5,069
Threads: 611
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation:
0
01-29-2020, 07:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-29-2020, 07:32 PM by j.p..)
That was simply an extension to this comment you made to emphasize how phucked up this is. I haven't edited anything away on this thread.
"and you can start with Schiff, Nadler, Pelosi and Schumer"
Posts: 6,766
Threads: 2,019
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
You know your edits, including the time you did it are inbedded in those posts, right?
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 5,069
Threads: 611
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation:
0
01-29-2020, 09:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-29-2020, 10:02 PM by j.p..)
The post you embedded was a miss post ( It should be obvious). I immediately re-did it while you were replying to the original. Take a peek at the time stamps.
I own everything I post. And unlike others I own my factual errors.
Not once was a political party mentioned until you went off on the Democrats. Then I gently reminded you that GOP was also probably violating the intent of the law.
Well actually the re-do wasn't immediately after I posted it. It was immediately I discovered how ridiculous it was, but still while you were replying to the original.
Honest injun